Showing posts with label Le Corbusier. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Le Corbusier. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

LE CORBUSIER TROPICALIZED: PALAPA PAVILION BY SANTIAGO BORJA AT VILLA SAVOYE













 

Sitio by Santiago Borja at Villa Savoye

Sitio is an intervention by Mexican artist Santiago Borja on Le Corbusier’s Villa Savoye, that takes as its starting point, the Villa’s present condition of deterritorialized and timeless cultural icon, as an object that floats in space and time, struggling with the possibility of becoming just a remarkable but empty shell.

The word Sitio put its emphasis in the concept of place, of anthropological site, a place that is symbolically determined. Is in this sense that Sitio proposes a multilayered reading of the different phenomena that surrounds and anchors the Villa Savoye, as a kind of plea for what we could call “anachronic contemporaneity”.

The main structure of Sitio is called Destinerrance and has been proposed by Santiago Borja for the Villa’s park. It has been conceived as the “unnatural” superposition of two palapas, a structure that pays homage to an ancient maya building tradition but that has been undertaken from a contemporary perspective. We could also say that Destinerrance takes its final form through an oblique quotation of Hadrian’s Pantheon in Rome, one of Le Corbusier’s favorites buildings.

Sitio is indeed haunted by a Warburgian spirit that will establish a spatial relationship, between two heterogeneous structures, in the one hand the Villa Savoye and in the other Destinerrance. This “Anachronic Montage” will highlight the formal similarities in between the two structures, which could also be seen through Warburg’s analysis of recurrent forms in statuary art, under the concept of “Pathosformel”, a kind of eternal renewal of forms or formulas of emotional style. So it will unveil the formal connections in between two different cultures through the use of imagination and subjective experience. They will question in a dialectic way the concept of habitat, of formal architectural language, and the selection of building materials and techniques regarding what we could call their “natural” context.

The project Sitio is also a response to Adolf Max Vogt's thesis developed in his book Le Corbusier The Noble Savage (2003) where he suggests that the architect Le Corbusier was certainly influenced by lake dwellings on piles discovered in Switzerland during his childhood, he traces back the invention of pilotis no to high rationalism as argued by Le Corbusier but to childhood memories of these dwellings permeated by imagination and fantasy. Taking this into account, Sitio will establish a dialogue with the sometimes hidden fascination modernism had with primitivism and its simple and “expressionist” spirit.

It is worth mentioning here that the leading thread of the exhibition is the concept of weaving present in all the pieces in the exhibition. We see weaving as a primeval cultural asset and as the quintessential way of giving structure to something and in that sense as a clear precedent to architecture.

Apart from Destinerrance the other pieces are; Tapis (Rugs) intended for the floor of the Villa's living spaces realized according to the dyes, fabrics and techniques of indigenous communities from southern Mexico and Cosmogonie suspendue, a weaved floating ceiling manufactured according to Mayan techniques and materials but structured through more sophisticated engineering. This piece will be suspended above the terrace of the Villa and would reveal the patterns used by this Indigenous community to represent the cosmos.

Finally, we believe it is worth asking if the Villa Savoye is just meant to be a penetrable Sculpture or if its existence can still raise more questions than just praise. What is really Le Corbusier’s legacy and how do we handle and preserve this cultural heritage? In our point of view, they are essential to this project the ideas of translation and displacement, of exchange and contamination, of pollination or dissemination, that can embody new approaches to cultural globalization. For this purpose we have also developed privileged partnerships with several organizations, in particular with the Mexican National Park of Sian Ka'an in the Yucatan Riviera that guards and protects the Chiit palms used to thatch the palapas, a group of Mayan palaperos, and the French Architecture School of la Villette. In this same spirit, the project includes the creation of a physical, perennial and natural bond between a Mexican site (Preserved site of Sian Ka' An) and the botanical garden of Marseille thanks to the plantation of seeds from Chiit's palm trees, now in extinction. These works will affirm the relevance of the integration of local ancestral ways of making things (probably condemned to disappear), and a more global contemporary discourse, that looks into the future.

Thursday, July 1, 2010

LINA, LE CORBU, FLAVIO, BERNARDES, MATTA, VALPARAISO, AT 'DESVIOS DE LA DERIVA' CURATED BY LISETTE LAGNADO AND MARIA BERRIOS AT REINA SOFIA, MADRID


Le Corbusier, Plan for the Development of Rio de Janeiro, 1929


Le Corbusier, Sketches done during Conference in Rio, 1936


Roberto Matta, 'Snail's Trace', 1937


Roberto Matta, 'The Red Sun', 1938


Roberto Matta, 'Morphology', 1937


Roberto Matta, 'Star, Flower, Personagge, and Stone', 1938



Flavio de Carvalho, Hacienda Capuava, 1939




Flavio de Carvalho, 'Experience No. 3: New Look, Suit for the New Man of the Tropics', 1956 (moving display by Dominique Gonzalez Foerster)


Lina Bo Bardi, Museu de Arte, Sao Paulo, Burle Marx exhibition, 1947


Lina Bo Bardi, Museum next to the Ocean, 1951 (unrealized)


Lina Bo Bardi, Museu de Arte de Sao Paulo, 1957-1968





Lina Bo Bardi, Museu de Arte de Sao Paulo, studies for exhibition displays, and exhibition display, 1957-1968


Lina Bo Bardi, Sesc Pompeia, 1977


Lina Bo Bardi, studies for the cafeteria of Sesc Pompeia, 1977


Sergio Bernardes, 'Rio do Futuro', 1963, city of leisure, bridges and helicoidal towers over Rio de Janeiro





exhibition rooms and exhibition guardians


Drifts and Derivations: Experiences, journeys and morphologies
Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía
Curators: Lisette Lagnado and María Berríos
May 5 - August 23, 2010

The different Brazilian and Chilean architectural concepts that form the subject of this exhibition share a humanist, visionary basis in their way of approaching the relationship between public space and collective life, topography and urbanism. This is reflected in drawings, texts and architectural models by Flavio de Carvalho (1899-1973), Juan Borchers (1910-1975), Lina Bo Bardi (1914-1992), Roberto Matta (1911-2002), and Sergio Bernardes (1919-2002), and in the Valparaíso School’s communal teaching. Poet-architects were torn between a growing drive towards modernity and technology’s promise to reduce working hours and increase leisure time. Their goal was to expand the space for homo ludens and implement a community-based life. In the case of Brazil, this was based on Carvalho’s take on Oswald de Andrade’s Anthropophagous Manifesto (1928), while in Chile it involved the assumption of values based on hospitality and accessibility.

The notion of “drift” used here arises in response to the question, “What was the extent of the rationalist prophecy in South America?” Constant’s notion of “unitary urbanism” comes to mind as does Guy Debord and his colleagues’ idea of “dérive” — but they are not applicable here. . Over the course of the exhibition visitors will realise that they are far from war-ruined Europe, where “the house of Man crumbled”.1 They will not encounter the logical premises that built modernity there. Prior to his first trip to South America, Le Corbusier (1887-1965) considered that using a meander meant reproducing the irregular form of a “mule trail” found in the medieval city. After his 1929 trip, however, he allowed himself to design a building-viaduct in the form of a huge wave set in the topography of a hilly landscape. The exhibition brings up the New World’s questioning of the old civilizations, as well as Sergio Buarque de Holanda’s famous distinction between the Portuguese “sower’s carelessness” and the Spanish “tile layer’s reason” (1936) to explain different phases of colonialism, domination and urbanisation: whereas the former type evolves randomly, the latter is purposefully constructed as in a grid.

There are, however, other forms of drift. They go by different names: experience, psychological morphology, journey. Rather than architects or urban planners, it was poets who invented names to evoke civilisations in the tropics and the Andes. Utopia-land is the result of Blaise Cendrars’ Brazilian adventure, in the legendary 1920s, across a continent imbued with hope; while the Amereida, an Aeneid for the southern hemisphere, took shape in 1965 from a collective project that deliberately omitted the concept of authorship.2

Like Cendrars, other foreigners considered Brazil a “spiritual homeland” characterised by a superior nature and flexible national boundaries. For Lina Bo Bardi, who emigrated to her “country of choice” in 1946, architecture was “an art that has to seriously take into account the land in which it is practiced.” 3 Her praise of the vernacular nature of modern consciousness derives from the Anthropophagous Manifesto. Understanding how crafts coexisted with different modes of industrial production throws light on the issue of a “synthesis of the arts”, a guide to the present exhibition.

Le Corbusier’s sketch anticipating the future of Rio de Janeiro (which Sergio Bernardes developed in his 1965 version of the vertical-barrios) has generated divergent interpretations. Notwithstanding an enduring admiration for the great master, these disagreements have given rise to changes in direction. For example, the young Roberto Matta left Chile to work with Le Corbusier in 1934-35 but then renounced him, in order to embrace Surrealism, as celebrated in Mathématique Sensible – Architecture du Temps.4 For Matta, the humanisation of architecture into a psychic, purely subjective space involved a form of spatial eroticisation: space became soft in order to mould itself to the bodies and sensory desires of its inhabitants.

Nor was the encounter between Le Corbusier and Flavio de Carvalho in 1929 more fruitful: the Brazilian’s efforts to introduce the syntax of modern architecture into São Paulo never took concrete shape. Carvalho’s un-built projects reinforced the label of “revolutionary romantic” given to him by Le Corbusier. But he then followed a path contrary to the “efficacy” of the master’s dictates. Inspired by his reading of Freud, Carvalho had in mind other paradigms. The twentieth-century city would become an extension of the home and would be aimed at the “naked man” (the anthropophagus), liberated from the concepts of a bourgeois life-style, family and property. This approach is even evidenced in Carvalho’s New Look (1956), a masculine suit ideal for modern life in the tropics and a forerunner of the miniskirt.

How, then, can an ode to functionalist urbanism be justified in Latin-American cities that are premised on informality? Can it be said that “drifting” has always been the best response? In his attempt to understand this urban imagery, Adrián Gorelik has pointed to “interruption” as a recurring sign in the symbolic representation of South American countries.5 This exhibition highlights many such disruptive, unfinished, suspended or betrayed directions. On July 31 1965, local press in Punta Arenas, in the far south of Chile, announced: “Ten university professors embark on a geo-poetical study across Latin America.” On September 10, the expedition retreated before reaching Santa Cruz de la Sierra in the Amazon Basin, for reasons only revealed two years later: Che Guevara’s guerrilla forces had entered the region, which was already controlled by US intelligence services.

For complex reasons that do not need to be detailed here, South America became a fertile laboratory for numerous heterotopias – or countermodels. Until recently many of these artistic manifestations were considered late, even counterfeit. Yet far from having exhausted their potential, they now overshadow Eurocentric narratives. It was Lina Bo Bardi who, once again, recognized the significance of popular culture in the making of Brazilian modernism, arguing that it “does not derive from colonial (architecture) but from the primitive caipira, (the rural architecture) of the peasant.”6

During the 1960s artists gravitated towards those architecture schools which offered a mixture of human sciences (philosophical and anthropological) in place of the technical and military focus associated with the architect-engineer. By conceiving territory flexibly, in cultural terms, space could be approached through poiesis rather than a strictly functionalist agenda. The Open City in Valparaíso reflected this desire to encompass life in all its unexpectedness. Manifest mostly on the university campus today, its legacy is the clearest representation of an idea of utopia that has no resonance within a Neo-liberal system that continues to resist facing its failure to produce habitable space.

Selected bibliography:
-Flavio de Carvalho, Curated by Walter Zanini and Rui Moreira Leite. 17ª Bienal de São Paulo, 1983
-Ferraz, Marcelo (Coord. ed.) Lina Bo Bardi. São Paulo: Instituto Lina Bo e P. M. Bardi, 1993
-Le Corbusier. Précisions. Sur un état présent de l’ Architecture et de l’Urbanisme. Paris: Les Éditions G. Crès et Cie., Collection de “L’Esprit Nouveau”, 1930 [Eng. Ed.: Precisions: On the Present State of Architecture and City Planning. Translated by Edith Schreiber Aujame. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1991]
-Pérez de Arce, Rodrigo; Pérez Oyarzun, Fernando. Valparaíso School. Open City Group. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhäuser – Publishers for Architecture, 2003